From Kinetic Theory to Quantum Fluids: A Guided Journey Through the Emergence of Hydrodynamics – Chapter 11

5 minute read

Published:

This is where the kinetic derivation connects with modern quantum fluids. Up to now we have treated quantum statistics as a modification of the equilibrium distribution. In this chapter we will explore what happens in the strongly quantum regimes, where the gas is no longer a small correction to the classical picture.

There are two fundamentally different limits:

  1. Degenerate Fermi gases
    • dominated by Pauli exclusion,
    • finite pressure exists even at zero temperature,
    • transport is controlled by excitations near the Fermi surface.
  2. Degenerate Bose gases
    • dominated by macroscopic occupation of quantum states,
    • Bose enhancement becomes extreme,
    • a condensate component appears and a single-fluid kinetic description becomes incomplete.

The interesting point is that the Chapman–Enskog framework still tells us where these effects enter.


Chapter 11 — Degenerate Quantum Fluids: Fermi and Bose Limits of Quantum Navier–Stokes


11.1 The Quantum Degeneracy Parameter

The crossover between classical and quantum behavior is controlled by

\[\boxed{n\lambda_T^3}\]

where

\[\lambda_T= \frac{h}{\sqrt{2\pi mk_BT}}\]

is the thermal wavelength.

Three regimes exist:

\[n\lambda_T^3\ll1\]

classical gas,

\[n\lambda_T^3\sim1\]

quantum gas,

\[n\lambda_T^3\gg1\]

strongly degenerate gas.

The Chapman–Enskog derivation remains formally valid as long as local equilibrium exists, but the thermodynamics and collision physics change dramatically.


Part I — Degenerate Fermi Fluids


11.2 The Zero-Temperature Fermi Gas

For fermions,

\[f_F = \frac{1} {z^{-1}e^{mc^2/(2k_BT)}+1}.\]

At very low temperature,

\[T\rightarrow0\]

the distribution approaches a step function:

\[\boxed{f_F(p) = \Theta(p_F-p)}\]

where

\[p_F = \hbar(3\pi^2n)^{1/3}\]

is the Fermi momentum.

The particles fill all states up to the Fermi surface.


11.3 Fermi Pressure

The pressure becomes

\[p_F = \frac{2}{5} nE_F\]

where

\[\boxed{E_F= \frac{p_F^2}{2m}}\]

is the Fermi energy.

This is a remarkable result:

\[\boxed{p_F\neq0 \quad\text{even when}\quad T=0.}\]

The pressure is not thermal.

It is a purely quantum mechanical consequence of the Pauli exclusion principle.


11.4 Quantum Euler Equation for a Fermi Fluid

The momentum equation becomes

\[\rho \frac{D u_i}{Dt} = -\partial_i p_F .\]

Using

\[p_F = \frac{2}{5}nE_F\]

we obtain

\[\boxed{\rho \frac{D\mathbf{u}}{Dt} = -\nabla \left( \frac{2}{5}nE_F \right).}\]

This is the macroscopic manifestation of degeneracy pressure.

It appears in:

  • electron gases in metals,
  • white dwarf stars,
  • neutron matter,
  • ultracold Fermi atoms.

11.5 Fermi Surface and Transport

At low temperature, almost all states are blocked.

A collision can only occur if particles are excited near the Fermi surface.

The available phase space scales as

\[\sim \left(\frac{k_BT}{E_F}\right)^2.\]

Therefore,

\[\boxed{\tau_F^{-1} \propto T^2.}\]

This is the famous Fermi-liquid result.

Consequently,

\[\boxed{\mu_F \propto \tau_F \propto T^{-2}.}\]

The viscosity increases strongly as the temperature decreases.


11.6 The Fermi Heat Flux

Unlike viscosity, heat transport requires excitations.

At zero temperature:

\[\boxed{\kappa_F\rightarrow0.}\]

There are no thermal excitations available.

At low temperature:

\[C_V \propto T\]

and

\[\kappa_F \sim C_V v_F^2\tau_F.\]

Therefore,

\[\boxed{\kappa_F \propto T^{-1}.}\]

This is a hallmark of degenerate Fermi liquids.


Part II — Degenerate Bose Fluids


11.7 Bose–Einstein Condensation

For bosons,

\[f_B = \frac{1}{ z^{-1}e^{mc^2/(2k_BT)}-1 }.\]

The fugacity satisfies

\[0<z\le1.\]

At the critical temperature:

\[z\rightarrow1.\]

The excited states cannot accommodate all particles.

The excess particles accumulate in the ground state:

\[\boxed{N_0/N = 1- \left( \frac{T}{T_c} \right)^{3/2}.}\]

This is Bose–Einstein condensation.


11.8 Why Single-Fluid BGK Breaks Down

The kinetic distribution describes thermal particles.

But the condensate is a coherent quantum state.

The system naturally separates into:

Condensate

\[n_0,\mathbf{u}_0\]

Thermal cloud

\[n_T,\mathbf{u}_T\]

Therefore the hydrodynamics becomes:

\[\boxed{\text{two-fluid hydrodynamics}.}\]

This is the foundation of Landau’s theory of superfluidity.


11.9 Superfluid Equations

The condensate velocity is not determined by collisions.

Instead,

\[\boxed{\mathbf{u}_s = \frac{\hbar}{m}\nabla\phi}\]

where \(\phi\) is the condensate phase.

The superfluid component obeys

\[\boxed{m \frac{\partial\mathbf{u}_s}{\partial t} + \nabla \left( \frac{1}{2}mu_s^2 +\mu \right) =0.}\]

This is no longer a dissipative Navier–Stokes equation.

It is closer to an inviscid Euler equation.


11.10 Thermal Bose Component

The normal component still obeys kinetic theory.

Its transport coefficients involve Bose integrals:

\[G_\nu^{(-)}(z).\]

Near condensation:

\[z\rightarrow1^-\]

these integrals become strongly enhanced.

The collision term contains

\[1+f_B\]

which increases scattering into occupied states.

This leads to:

  • enhanced scattering,
  • unusual viscosity,
  • anomalous thermal transport.

11.11 Quantum Navier–Stokes Structure

For a degenerate quantum gas we can write schematically:

\[\boxed{\rho \frac{D\mathbf{u}}{Dt} = -\nabla p_q + \nabla\cdot\Pi_q}\]

with

\[\Pi_q = -\mu_q \left[ \nabla\mathbf{u} + (\nabla\mathbf{u})^T -\frac{2}{3}I\nabla\cdot\mathbf{u} \right].\]

The new physics is entirely in:

\[p_q\] \[\mu_q\] \[\kappa_q.\]

11.12 Comparison of Extreme Limits

 ClassicalDegenerate FermiCondensed Bose
Pressure sourcethermalPauli exclusioninteractions/thermal cloud
\(T=0\) pressurezerofinitedepends on interactions
CollisionsnormalPauli blockedBose enhanced
Viscosityfinitegrows at low \(T\)strongly modified
Heat conductionclassicalvanishes as \(T\to0\)two-fluid transport
HydrodynamicsNavier–StokesFermi liquidsuperfluid hydrodynamics

11.13 The Deeper Connection

The Chapman–Enskog expansion reveals something subtle:

The Navier–Stokes equations are not fundamentally “classical.”

Their structure comes from:

  • conservation laws,
  • symmetry,
  • near-equilibrium expansion.

Those ingredients also exist in quantum gases.

What changes is the equation of state and transport physics.

The same mathematical skeleton can describe:

  • air,
  • electron fluids,
  • neutron matter,
  • ultracold atomic gases,

provided the appropriate kinetic equilibrium and collision physics are inserted.


Where this leads next

A particularly interesting path would be:

Chapter 12 — From Quantum BGK to Quantum Hydrodynamics: the connection with the Gross–Pitaevskii equation, Wigner functions, and quantum pressure terms.

That chapter would address a subtle point: the Navier–Stokes equations derived here are quantum statistical equations, but they do not yet contain the dispersive “quantum pressure” term familiar from Bose–Einstein condensates:

\[-\frac{\hbar^2}{2m} \nabla \left( \frac{\nabla^2\sqrt n}{\sqrt n} \right).\]

Understanding why that term is absent from BGK-based quantum hydrodynamics—and how it emerges from a different kinetic starting point—is one of the most interesting bridges between kinetic theory and modern quantum fluids.